A full production supplier vs separate hires
Choose between one full-service AV and staging supplier or hire specialists separately. Learn when each approach works and the coordination costs of splitting.
Event production often derails not because of bad kit, but because one person is juggling five jobs at once. When you're booking AV, staging, screens and lighting, the choice between a single full-service supplier and hiring separate specialists shapes how smoothly everything actually works.
The real pressure point emerges during setup. A production coordinator managing three different teams on-site faces staggered arrivals, conflicting power demands, cable disputes and zero single point of accountability when something doesn't integrate. Most venues flag this too late, when rigging is already underway and someone's waiting for a cable that's still in another truck.
When one supplier makes sense
A full production house brings crew, equipment and coordination under one roof. Their AV engineer knows the staging grid before arrival. Power distribution is pre-planned. Cables route through a unified network. If a screen fails mid-event, the same team that built it fixes it without a thirty-minute phone call between companies.
This works best for high-stakes events where integration is tight: corporate product launches, conferences with complex switching, awards ceremonies where live cameras feed to screens that cue graphics. The supplier owns the whole production narrative. They coordinate load-in timing, manage the cable runs, run the show from one desk. You speak to one person. One invoice. One team absorbs the risk if something doesn't talk to something else.
Full-service suppliers also carry liability across their whole scope. If a screen goes down because of their staging installation, they can't blame the AV company and vice versa.
When separate hires win
Break it apart when your event has distinct, self-contained needs. A conference with straightforward slides and background music doesn't need integrated production engineering. A venue launch where staging is purely visual and AV is just microphones and speakers has minimal dependencies.
Separate specialists also make sense if you already have a trusted AV partner and just need screens added, or you're working within a fixed budget and need to shop each category independently. A specialist staging company may outperform a generalist full-service house on complex rigging; likewise, a dedicated AV firm might run a tighter camera-and-switching operation than a staging company's afterthought AV division.
You also gain flexibility. One supplier runs late; you swap them for another without renegotiating the whole production. One team's rates shoot up; you competitively source the next hire. You're not locked into a package deal.
The hidden costs of splitting
Coordination becomes your responsibility. You book the staging company, then the AV company, then discover the staging grid doesn't allow the screen footprint the AV supplier quoted. One team arrives at 6 a.m., the other at 9 a.m., and the staging crew is already hung and blocking the entrance for the AV delivery truck. Power requirements overlap; someone's working without full capacity. A screen flickers; is it the AV loom, the staging installation, or the venue's power? Now you're trapped in a three-way finger-pointing loop on the morning of your event.
If things break mid-show, you're negotiating between teams. If cable gets damaged during rigging, you're clarifying whose insurance covers it. Separate hires multiply handoffs, and handoffs multiply failure points.
How to decide
Map your event's dependencies. If AV feeds to screens, staging supports AV cables, and everything runs live from one control point, go full-service. If each service is essentially independent, splitting works. Ask each potential supplier how they'd handle the other categories: would they subcontract, or step back entirely? A full-service supplier should have a coherent answer; a specialist should know their limits.
Confirm how contingency is handled. Full-service means one team scrambles if something fails. Separate hires means you're calling both simultaneously and hoping they talk to each other faster than you can. Budget not just for the hire, but for your own coordination time if you're splitting.
Verified suppliers on Strove can show you their actual scope and track record—ask what they've integrated before and what they've handed off, so you know exactly what you're getting.
Common questions
- What's the main risk of hiring separate AV and staging companies?
- Coordination becomes your job. If arrivals stagger, power requirements conflict, or something doesn't integrate, you're managing the dispute between teams. Integration failures—like screens that don't receive the AV signal cleanly—trap you in a three-way clarification loop on show day.
- When is a full-service supplier worth the extra cost?
- When your event has tight integration: live cameras feeding to screens, graphics switching, complex rigging that supports AV, or a single control desk running everything. One team means one point of accountability and built-in coordination.
- Can I start with one supplier and add another mid-booking?
- Yes, but confirm compatibility first. Ask your staging supplier if they've worked with your chosen AV company, or if they use standard interfaces (like HDMI or DMX). Retrofitting integration is costlier and riskier than planning it upfront.
- Who's responsible if something fails when I hire separately?
- That depends on the failure. If a screen doesn't light because the AV loom is faulty, that's AV's problem; if the staging installation damaged the cable run, that's staging's problem. You may end up clarifying this after the fact, which is why full-service avoids the ambiguity.
Find a verified provider on Strove
Compare vetted staging & screens providers, check their credentials, and book or request a quote — all in one place.
Find a Business