Choosing an attorney to represent you when you've been served
Find an attorney who specialises in your case type, challenges your assumptions, and will actually appear in court. Key criteria when you've been served.
Being served with legal papers is a jolt. Your first instinct may be to hire the nearest attorney, but who you choose now will shape every decision ahead—how you respond, what you'll spend, and whether you stand a real chance of the outcome you need. The core trade-off is this: you need someone with the right courtroom experience and a track record on cases like yours, but you also need someone who will be straight with you about your position, not just take your money and run through the motions.
Experience in your specific conflict
Not all litigation is the same. An attorney who excels at divorces may flounder in a commercial contract dispute. One skilled in eviction matters may have no grounding in employment law. When you've been served, ask exactly what your case category is—is it a debt claim, a breach of contract, a delict matter, an employment dispute, a property issue? Then ask potential attorneys: how many cases like this have you handled, how many went to judgment, and what were the outcomes?
Don't accept vague answers. If an attorney says "I handle all kinds of litigation," that's a warning. Probe their last three similar cases. Did they settle? Go to trial? What was the defendant's main argument, and how did they counter it? A genuine specialist will give you specifics; they'll also tell you what their competitors typically do wrong in these matters, because they've seen the patterns.
Whether they'll push back on your case
The attorney who agrees with everything you say is not protecting you. Being served does not mean you're definitely in the wrong—but it also doesn't mean you're definitely right. The second-best thing that can happen is that your attorney spots weaknesses in your position early and tells you frankly. The worst thing is that they discover those weaknesses in court, in front of a judge, when it's too late to adjust strategy.
Listen carefully in your first meeting. A strong attorney will ask hard questions: What's your proof? What's the other side likely to argue? What's your real financial exposure if you lose? If they're pressing on uncomfortable points, they're doing their job. If they're not, they're either inexperienced or setting you up for a shock later. Trust the one who makes you defend your own account.
Responsiveness and communication style
Once litigation begins, delays often hurt more than distance. You want an attorney who returns your calls or WhatsApp messages within a day or two, not a week. You also want someone who talks to you in plain language, not legal jargon wrapped around vague updates. When you ask "what happens next," you should get a timeline and the reason for each step, not "we're waiting to see what they do."
Ask about their caseload. If they're managing 150 active files, your matter is one of many; that might be fine if it's straightforward, but if it's complex or contestable, you want someone with breathing room. Conversely, a new or recently qualified attorney with a lighter load might be cheaper and equally sharp, but you need to ask how they'll handle specialist points that arise. Will they brief a senior? Who's your actual point of contact?
Geography and court familiarity
If your case will be heard in the Magistrate's Court in your local province, an attorney who regularly appears there has an advantage. They know the court's preferences, the judges' tendencies, the registry's quirks. That said, many cases are now handled partly on paper, via email and virtual appearance, so an attorney two provinces away is far less of a handicap than it once was.
What matters more is whether your attorney actually appears in person when it counts, or whether they'll brief a junior or an advocate to do the court work while they handle the backroom strategy. Either can work, but you need to know who's who and why. Ask them to be clear about their own courtroom time on cases like yours.
Before you commit, you should also verify they hold a current practising licence—ask for their name and number and check it with their provincial law society. On Strove, verified attorneys have already been through that step, so you can focus on which one fits your case and your communication needs.
Common questions
- Should I hire the cheapest attorney if I've been served?
- No. Litigation fees reflect experience and availability more than quality. A cheaper attorney may have less courtroom experience or a heavier caseload, which often costs you more in the long run through delays or weak strategy. Compare what you're paying for, not just the number itself.
- What if the attorney I approach says I don't have a good case?
- Listen carefully. If more than one experienced attorney says your position is weak, that's real information. It doesn't mean you should cave, but it means you need a clear-eyed strategy—settlement, damage control, or a very specific gamble—not blind hope. A good attorney will help you decide which.
- Can I switch attorneys mid-litigation?
- Yes, but it costs time and money. Your new attorney has to get up to speed, file an update of attorney form with the court, and may miss tactical opportunities the previous one created. Choose carefully the first time, but don't stay with someone who isn't working if it's early enough to change course.
- What questions should I ask about their experience with the other side's typical arguments?
- Ask: "In cases like mine, what's the defendant's strongest defence, and how have you countered it?" and "What mistakes do I see litigants in my position make?" Their answers reveal whether they've really fought these battles before or are winging it.
Find a verified provider on Strove
Compare vetted litigation representation providers, check their credentials, and book or request a quote — all in one place.
Find a Business