How to check a practitioner has actually won disputes with SARS
Verify a tax practitioner's SARS dispute wins through registration checks, client references, and proof of outcomes. Check their track record before hiring.
The biggest mistake people make is taking a practitioner's word for it. When someone claims they've successfully challenged SARS assessments, you hear confidence—but confidence isn't proof. Many tax practitioners talk big about dispute wins without evidence to back it up. Before you hand over your case files, you need concrete ways to verify that track record.
Check their professional registration first
Start with the basics. Ask for their registration number with the relevant professional body—this might be SAIPA (South African Institute of Professional Accountants), ICA (Institute of Certified Accountants), or if they're an attorney, the Law Society of South Africa. Get the specific registration number and verify it yourself on the body's public register. This tells you they're bound by professional standards and ethical rules, but it doesn't confirm dispute wins yet—it just means they're legitimate practitioners. A registration is necessary but not sufficient.
If they can't produce a registration number or it doesn't check out, stop there. You're not being paranoid; you're being careful.
Ask for references and follow up properly
Request the contact details of clients whose SARS disputes they've resolved. A legitimate practitioner should have at least three or four they can share (with client permission). Don't just collect the names; call them. When you speak to past clients, ask specific questions:
- What was the nature of the dispute (assessment, objection, appeal, or something else)?
- How much was in dispute, roughly speaking?
- Did the practitioner achieve a reduction or a full withdrawal of the assessment?
- How long did the process take?
- Would they recommend this person again?
Listen for hesitation or vagueness. Someone who won a real dispute will remember the details. If a reference sounds evasive or says something like "they tried their best" without mentioning an actual outcome, that's a warning. You're not asking for client names to be polite—you're doing due diligence.
If the practitioner claims they can't share references because of confidentiality, they're being evasive. Professional confidentiality doesn't prevent a satisfied client from giving their permission to be contacted; a genuine winner will have clients happy to vouch for them.
Request proof of specific wins
Ask the practitioner to share evidence of dispute outcomes. This might include:
- A SARS letter confirming withdrawal or amendment of an assessment
- Correspondence showing the original disputed amount versus the final amount SARS accepted
- A ruling or determination from the SARS Appeals and Cases Management division
- Documentation of settlement correspondence, if a compromise was reached
They should provide these anonymised (names and identifying details redacted) to protect other clients' privacy. If they refuse outright or say "I can't show you anything without revealing confidential information," that's a red flag. Redacting names takes five minutes. The fact that they won't tells you something.
Be realistic about what you're looking for. A dispute resolved five years ago might be harder to produce evidence for, but recent wins should have a paper trail. Someone who won a dispute last year should be able to pull a SARS letter or settlement agreement within a week.
Check their approach in a conversation
When you meet or call, ask them to walk you through how they'd handle your specific dispute. Do they ask detailed questions about your situation, or do they launch into a generic pitch? Do they mention timelines and SARS procedures by name (objection deadlines, appeals authority processes)? Do they explain what success might actually look like in your case, or do they promise the world?
Someone who has really fought disputes will speak with precision. They'll mention specific SARS forms, timelines, and the actual stages of escalation. Vague talk about "fighting SARS" is a sign they're selling hope, not experience.
Once you've done these checks—registration confirmed, references contacted and positive, proof of wins shared, and their approach sounds grounded—you're in a much better position to decide. You won't have eliminated all risk, but you'll have moved beyond guesswork. Finding a verified tax practitioner with a real track record on Strove means you can start this process with someone already filtered for legitimacy.
Common questions
- What should I look for in references from past clients?
- Ask specifically about the outcome—did SARS reduce or withdraw the assessment? Request details about the dispute type, amount, and timeline. Contact them directly and listen for concrete answers rather than vague reassurance. Someone who won a real case will remember the specifics.
- Why won't the practitioner show me proof of previous wins?
- A legitimate practitioner can share redacted versions of SARS letters or settlement agreements without revealing client names. If they refuse to provide any anonymised evidence, they may not have the track record they claim. Confidentiality doesn't mean they can't prove their wins exist.
- Does professional registration guarantee they've won SARS disputes?
- No. Registration confirms they meet professional standards and ethics, but it doesn't prove dispute-resolution experience. It's a necessary starting point, not the full answer. Always verify registration and then ask for specific dispute outcomes.
- How recent should their dispute wins be?
- Recent wins (within the last one to two years) are more relevant to current SARS procedures and timelines. Older cases are less meaningful unless they've handled recent disputes too. Ask how many disputes they've handled in the past 12 months.
Find a verified provider on Strove
Compare vetted sars dispute resolution providers, check their credentials, and book or request a quote — all in one place.
Find a Business